当システム
  詳細検索
Japanese | English 

Nara Women's University Digital Information Repository > 010 文学部 > 社会学論集 > 17号 >

このアイテムのファイル:

ファイル 記述 サイズ形式
AN10436699v17_pp55-81.pdf6.02 MBAdobe PDF見る/開く
タイトル: 「社会学的機能主義」とは何であったか」 ―理論社会学の陥穽(2-1)―
その他のタイトル: What was a Sociological Functionalism?
著者: 新, 睦人 link image
著者(別表記) : Ararashi, Mutsundo
著者読み: あたらし, むつんど
キーワード: Sociological functionalism; Structural-Functional Analysis; functional requisites; organic whole; 社会学的機能主義; 構造的-機能的な要件; 機能的要件; 有機体的な全体
発行日: 2010年 5月 1日
出版者: 奈良女子大学社会学研究会
引用: 新 睦人 : 奈良女子大学社会学論集 (奈良女子大学社会学研究会) , 第17号, pp. 55-81
抄録: A position ”General orientation" that was called “Sociological Functionalism in the sociological theory after World War II center was occupied. It was a conception of peculiar functionalism to sociology via the functionalistic anthropology. It assumes finding the meaning in consideration or the observation of a social event as relations various units, various elements, and between various items “function", the maintenance of the society and the culture, and development from the viewpoint in the effect that those unit and element accomplish to be a problem about the analysis. R. Merton systematically arranged a basic concept group, and advocated the concept of a latent function, a manifest function, a eufunction, and a dysfunction. It proposed T. Parsons as "Structure - Functionalism". However, he moved the center of the functional analysis to "Functional requirement" and devoted his energies to the use of "AGIL schema”, back. And M. Levy started synthesizing the idea of Merton and Persons. Such a research policy played an advanced role of the sociological theory , and led empirical research in the sociology in the 1950~1960’s in the position of the main current in the main typical book on the history of sociology, especially the development of the history of sociological theory and the book, for instance by N. Timasheff(1955) and D. Martindale(1960). As for sociological functionalism, power as the theoretical frame become weak, and the criticism from the inside and outside of this sect was developed intensely on the inside in which it participated as a research policy with Exchange theory, Ethnomethodology, and Critical theory etc. in the 70’. Parsons has to be called "Structure-Process analysis" that assumed no "Structure-Functionalism". Sociological functionalism will play a role with the development afterwards of the functional assay as one subordinate position frame of a social systems analysis pushing while connecting an organic whole image that is a theory tradition with a systematic social image.
記述: 清水新二教授定年退職記念号
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10935/2549
ISSN: 13404032
出現コレクション:17号

このアイテムの引用には次の識別子を使用してください: http://hdl.handle.net/10935/2549

当システムに保管されているアイテムはすべて著作権により保護されています。

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2006 MIT and Hewlett-Packard - ご意見をお寄せください